Lions and tigers and… giraffes??

Flicking through the contents of February’s issue of the Journal of Zoology, this paper* caught my eye (and how could it not!) – a study using claw marks to study lion predation on giraffes of the Serengeti. Wow!

Megan Strauss, a PhD student at the University of Minnesota working with the legendary Craig Packer (synonymous with lion research and the first in a distinguished lineage of PhD students supervised by my supervisor THC-B!), is the project director of the Serengeti Giraffe Project, where she carries out her research. With an impressive sample size of over 700, she has examined the characteristic laceration scars from wounds inflicted by lions on surviving giraffes to investigate the relationship between Serengeti giraffes and their most important predator – how attacks are distributed among the population and among study sites in the Serengeti, and how lions go about taking down such an unwieldy prey.

They found that around ten percent of all giraffes over a year old have survived at least one lion attack… unlike this one:

Image

A lack of claw marks on young giraffes suggests that calves are unlikely to survive attack. Claw mark prevalence was higher among females than males – as adult males are more often solitary, and in dense vegetation, they may be more susceptible to lethal attack. And, females, though they behave less riskily by staying in larger herds in open areas, may acquire these scars through defence of calves. Lastly, giraffes living in the study site with more open habitat where they aggregate in larger groups had fewer claw marks – so it seems that, as in the meerkat, group living has its perks!

*Strauss, M. K. L. and Packer, C. (2013), Using claw marks to study lion predation on giraffes of the Serengeti. Journal of Zoology, 289: 134–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00972.x

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Lions and tigers and… giraffes??

  1. So, one assumption of this paper is that the higher incidence of scarring on females indicates that attacks on males are more likely to be fatal (as there are fewer with scars) rather than that they avoid attack. Any thoughts on this?

  2. What a clever way to study lion attacks. Poor giraffes though (I’m not a scientist, I’m allowed to say that). Imagine looking at the scars of 700 giraffes… Impressive. Almost as impressive as actually managing to eat one…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s